Style or Format

Art - for Blog photo

This, as a question, was asked of me by a fellow writer.
The Question
He wrote: “Hey…I’ve finished the second Chet Seevers (Novelette?) and have to bounce one off of you. What is the proper format for a shorter story 25k?”
“In anything longer than a really short story, I start each scene or chapter with a title ie: Foreign Object Damage or Hard Landing, etc. Which seems improper with sometimes no more than 5 or so pages between.”
###
“In the original draft of this one…I have only used a centered # with spacing above and below for a scene break of sorts. Is that acceptable for a story of this length?”
“I can’t really find anything advising one way or another.”
***
The Answer
The next reply from me was obvious. We’ll throw it out to the blogisphere and see what others have to say.
What is the answer for Novelette length formats? Are chapters all right? Are chapter titles all right? And regarding scene breaks, is there a rule? Or is it whatever the agent, editor, publisher dictates?
Timothy J. Desmond
Blog at: https://timdesmondblog.wordpress.com
Amazon author page at: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B00694KQQO
Writing at: http://timothydesmond.wordpress.com
Art at: http://artbydesmond.wordpress.com

Self Promotion 3

Copy of Tim at Visalia Signing 2012
One older blog began with one sentence and was not finished. “Much of the latest focus on author promotions is weeding out “time wasting” exercises in ego stroking endeavors.” That was in may. I had written about it in a blog in last June titled Vanity Event. I wasn’t sure if book signings were that much a waste of time, as was being suggested. The other one, blog, got sidetracked for a number of reasons, but one reason was that I was trying to research the origin of that terms for ego stroking endeavors and vanity event.. And I had no luck in finding the origin. But, I had, subsequently, a discussion with another author about this, and it was a link in that June piece. It revolved around the fact that if you are having a book signing event, that it is an ego and vanity massaging event.
It is entirely possible that the first event one does is a vanity or ego thing. I freely admit it, and that first event. But, if one is shocked by the lack of sales at that first event where you don’t really sell thirty copies, the ego and vanity hit a brick wall. The ice breaking first book signing is simply that, the first book signing. After that, when other book signings are arranged, there is a more realistic view, expectation and, well, work. A signing event leads to discussions, speaking events, interviews, and each of these is growing an audience of sorts. I realize this is addressing having a book in print, and is not addressing the different promotional approach for an ebook – only – promotion. The last words on this, do you think it is a waste of time? I don’t think it is. Keep arranging events.
Timothy J. Desmond
Blog at: https://timdesmondblog.wordpress.com
Amazon author page at: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B00694KQQO
Writing at: http://timothydesmond.wordpress.com
Art at: http://artbydesmond.wordpress.com

PR – Self-PR

Art - cover - For Thou - front
As mentioned before, this series on author PR will be in several parts. The major sections will be: Tips and suggestions, Views and various international POV, Signing events, Talks and media, www, and Self-PR. Not in any particular order, some of the above considerations have less or more copy than others. One author suggests, after the initial flurry of one’s book, to keep one’s name in the public eye. That is, if an opportunity to appear in public, grab it. Also to not limit oneself to your genre or book area, but write for your civic organizations, clubs, organizational newsletters or other venues. Do not limit yourself. For this writer, this led to invitations to submit more articles.
Another writer mentioned that a small newspaper was started in or near the community and was offered a position of writing a column. It was the perfect thing to becoming a local personality. The low or zero pay was negligible compared to the exposure of “author name.”
One author wrote a letter of promotion to a local business where he was a local customer. The business liked it so much they put it in their newsletter. It was a kind of craziness that the provocative letter took on a life of its own. Local media picked up on it too, for that author, priceless PR.
More on Self-PR later.
Timothy J. Desmond
Tim’s Amazon author page at: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B00694KQQO
Writing site at: http://timsfiction-art.com
Art site at: http://artbydesmond.com

Author Roles

Art - cover The DocIn a recent blog it was said that self publishing and the changing marketing of print books in and by the publishing industry has caused a change in roles of authors. My comment was, “Good piece on growing changes in publishing, authorship, marketing and promotions. If there was a different perception in marketing print books compared to e-books – that now appears to be an illusion. Both versions need the same thing, and that is chatter, access, talk, presence in the blog-i-sphere, social audience and in the multi-media world of the industry we are working in. Keep it up here and on other sites. Thanks again.”
See that whole blog by Jerry D. Simmons here: http://www.writersreaders.com/changing-role-of-the-author/
It seems to me that with one’s new stories, books, or articles, one still must be out there pitching to agents and editors. Self publishing may be a growing role, and carries with it a huge learning curve of what larger publishers deal with and all their needs and problems. What do you think? Do you still need an editor and an agent?
Timothy J. Desmond
Tim’s Amazon author page at: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B00694KQQO
Writing site at: http://timsfiction-art.com
Art site at: http://artbydesmond.com

Getting an Agent

On replying to another writer on this subject … I am not at the same level of success here – my first book was a POD print version and the second book an e-book, there is so much familiar here. A friendly local writer told me once at an event, “You need an agent.” And while I walked away I knew I had tried and vowed to keep trying. That’s because I have four binders. Two are “editor campaigns” and two are “agent campaigns.” In the front pages of each are older printouts and lists from past editors and agents sent to in the 1990s. The newer lists are there, but divided by which book was being pitched. I usually sent out several mailings in groups of thirty editors or thirty agents. What I realized through the years, was that there were just as many flaky agents out there as the number of flaky writers. And though that is an unkind simplification, we know it’s a tough business, some well-justified and well-meaning agents can’t hang in there. Snail mail returns with stamped across the envelope, “Addressee Not Known” or “Not at this address” speaks for itself. Nothing was more frustrating than getting a response that stated “no longer accepting” and “not looking for fiction” – this after double checking the guidelines prior to sending. More than once, I was on the phone stating that the agency guidelines states otherwise, and asking, “Why wasn’t that guideline updated in a timely manner?” And maybe I’m just another flaky writer out there. Even through all that, the second book began to get more replies on the rejections with critiques, what was liked, what was needed, and these were, I realized, signs that what I was sending was better written. These were from some editors too, small presses and medium presses who were accepting un-agented manuscripts. And it may be true the “catch 22” thing, “that you need and agent to get a publisher, and you need a publishing history to get an agent.” I think the most snobbish thing from the big houses is the notion that they need the agents “to vet” the writers for them. And maybe they do. I had heard that directly at a writer’s conference. That same agent told me to send to his editor. That was a “requested work.” On complying and sending, I had no reply…. ever, neither from follow-ups nor calls. Crazy business.